🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.