🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has developed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.